Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
Z.AI
Apodex 1.1
Apodex

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) Z.AI	Apodex 1.1 Apodex
Intelligence	26.1	Best: 26.4
Coding	55.8	Best: 60.8
Agentic	23.9	Best: 28.4
Speed	65.4 t/s	—
TTFT	1.7 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$1.29×4.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$4.07×1.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $3
Context window	200K	Best: 256K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	Yes	No
Cost / task	$1.02×2.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.464

Intelligence

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 26.1
Apodex 1.1: Best: 26.4

Coding

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 55.8
Apodex 1.1: Best: 60.8

Agentic

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 23.9
Apodex 1.1: Best: 28.4

Speed

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 65.4 t/s
Apodex 1.1: —

TTFT

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 1.7 s
Apodex 1.1: —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): $1.29×4.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Apodex 1.1: Best: $0.30

Output · $ / 1M tokens

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): $4.07×1.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Apodex 1.1: Best: $3

Context window

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 200K
Apodex 1.1: Best: 256K

Reasoning

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): Yes
Apodex 1.1: Yes

Open weights

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): Yes
Apodex 1.1: No

Cost / task

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): $1.02×2.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Apodex 1.1: Best: $0.464

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)26.1 · $1.02
Apodex 1.126.4 · $0.464