Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)
Z.AI
Granite 4.2 8B
IBM

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) Z.AI	Granite 4.2 8B IBM
Intelligence	Best: 11.2	11.1
Coding	—	22.4
Math	85.3	—
Agentic	—	1.3
Speed	88.1 t/s	Best: 118 t/s
TTFT	3.32 s	Best: 0.85 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.30×5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.060
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$0.90×3.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.25
Context window	128K	Best: 131K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	Yes	Yes
Cost / task	—	$0.0236

Intelligence

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning): Best: 11.2
Granite 4.2 8B: 11.1

Coding

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning): —
Granite 4.2 8B: 22.4

Math

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning): 85.3
Granite 4.2 8B: —

Agentic

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning): —
Granite 4.2 8B: 1.3

Speed

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning): 88.1 t/s
Granite 4.2 8B: Best: 118 t/s

TTFT

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning): 3.32 s
Granite 4.2 8B: Best: 0.85 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning): $0.30×5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Granite 4.2 8B: Best: $0.060

Output · $ / 1M tokens

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning): $0.90×3.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Granite 4.2 8B: Best: $0.25

Context window

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning): 128K
Granite 4.2 8B: Best: 131K

Reasoning

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning): Yes
Granite 4.2 8B: Yes

Open weights

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning): Yes
Granite 4.2 8B: Yes

Cost / task

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning): —
Granite 4.2 8B: $0.0236

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)11.2 · $0.45
Granite 4.2 8B11.1 · $0.107