Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)
Z.AI
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) Z.AI	Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic
Intelligence	18.5	Best: 18.6
Coding	45.8	—
Math	86	—
Speed	35.3 t/s	—
TTFT	3.4 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.55	$15×27.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $2.20	$75×34.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	200K	200K
Reasoning	Yes	No
Open weights	Yes	No

Intelligence

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning): 18.5
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): Best: 18.6

Coding

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning): 45.8
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Math

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning): 86
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Speed

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning): 35.3 t/s
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

TTFT

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning): 3.4 s
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning): Best: $0.55
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): $15×27.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning): Best: $2.20
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): $75×34.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning): 200K
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): 200K

Reasoning

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning): Yes
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): No

Open weights

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning): Yes
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): No

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)18.5 · $0.963
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)18.6 · $30