Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)
Google
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)
Alibaba

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) Google	Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) Alibaba
Intelligence	13.1	13.1
Coding	—	22.6
Speed	Best: 93.5 t/s	19.9 t/s
TTFT	0.98 s	Best: 0.85 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.13×4.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.030
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$0.40×2.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.15
Context window	256K	Best: 262K
Reasoning	No	Yes
Open weights	Yes	Yes

Intelligence

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning): 13.1
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning): 13.1

Coding

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning): —
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning): 22.6

Speed

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning): Best: 93.5 t/s
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning): 19.9 t/s

TTFT

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning): 0.98 s
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning): Best: 0.85 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning): $0.13×4.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning): Best: $0.030

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning): $0.40×2.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning): Best: $0.15

Context window

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning): 256K
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning): Best: 262K

Reasoning

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning): No
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning): Yes

Open weights

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning): Yes
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning): Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)13.1 · $0.198
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)13.1 · $0.060