Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Step 3.5 Flash
StepFun
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Step 3.5 Flash StepFun | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 16.7 | 16.6 | |
| Coding | 39.3 | — | |
| Agentic | 2.9 | — | |
| Speed | 65.1 t/s | Best: 138 t/s | |
| TTFT | Best: 0.97 s | 3.31 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.10 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.40×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.30 | |
| Context window | 256K | 256K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- Best: 16.7
- Step 3.5 Flash
- 16.6
Coding
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 39.3
- Step 3.5 Flash
- —
Agentic
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 2.9
- Step 3.5 Flash
- —
Speed
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 65.1 t/s
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Best: 138 t/s
TTFT
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- Best: 0.97 s
- Step 3.5 Flash
- 3.31 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- $0.10
- Step 3.5 Flash
- $0.10
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- $0.40×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Best: $0.30
Context window
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 256K
- Step 3.5 Flash
- 256K
Reasoning
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- Yes
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Yes
Open weights
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- Yes
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)16.7 · $0.175
- Step 3.5 Flash16.6 · $0.15