Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
Google
Ring-2.6-1T
InclusionAI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) Google	Ring-2.6-1T InclusionAI
Intelligence	Best: 16.7	16.6
Coding	39.3	Best: 42.8
Agentic	2.9	Best: 10.7
Speed	65.1 t/s	Best: 114 t/s
TTFT	Best: 0.97 s	3.87 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.10	$0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.40	$2.50×6.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	256K	Best: 262K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	Yes	Yes
Cost / task	—	$0.287

Intelligence

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): Best: 16.7
Ring-2.6-1T: 16.6

Coding

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): 39.3
Ring-2.6-1T: Best: 42.8

Agentic

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): 2.9
Ring-2.6-1T: Best: 10.7

Speed

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): 65.1 t/s
Ring-2.6-1T: Best: 114 t/s

TTFT

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): Best: 0.97 s
Ring-2.6-1T: 3.87 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): Best: $0.10
Ring-2.6-1T: $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): Best: $0.40
Ring-2.6-1T: $2.50×6.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): 256K
Ring-2.6-1T: Best: 262K

Reasoning

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): Yes
Ring-2.6-1T: Yes

Open weights

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): Yes
Ring-2.6-1T: Yes

Cost / task

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): —
Ring-2.6-1T: $0.287

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)16.7 · $0.175
Ring-2.6-1T16.6 · $0.85