Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 9.4 | Best: 9.5 | |
| Speed | 111 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 2.49 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.10 | $0.29×2.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.30 | $1×3.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 262K | Best: 262K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)
- 9.4
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
- Best: 9.5
Speed
- Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)
- 111 t/s
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
- —
TTFT
- Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)
- 2.49 s
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)
- Best: $0.10
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
- $0.29×2.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)
- Best: $0.30
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
- $1×3.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)
- 262K
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
- Best: 262K
Reasoning
- Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)
- No
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
- Yes
Open weights
- Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)
- Yes
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)9.4 · $0.15
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking9.5 · $0.467