Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
Google
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Gemma 3 27B Instruct | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 4.9 | 4.9 | |
| Coding | 10.1 | — | |
| Math | Best: 20.7 | 6.7 | |
| Agentic | 0.1 | — | |
| Speed | — | 44.4 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 9.1 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.030 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.25 | |
| Context window | 128K | 128K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | $0 | — |
Intelligence
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- 4.9
- Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- 4.9
Coding
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- 10.1
- Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- —
Math
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- Best: 20.7
- Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- 6.7
Agentic
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- 0.1
- Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- —
Speed
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- —
- Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- 44.4 t/s
TTFT
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- —
- Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- 9.1 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- —
- Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- $0.030
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- —
- Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- $0.25
Context window
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- 128K
- Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- 128K
Reasoning
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- No
- Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- No
Open weights
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- Yes
- Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- Yes
Cost / task
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- $0
- Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct4.9 · $0
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning).