Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Low)
Google
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Xiaomi

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemini 3.8 Flash (Low) Google	MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) Xiaomi
Intelligence	Best: 22.5	22.4
Coding	73.5	—
Agentic	32.6	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.75	—
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$3.75	—
Context window	Best: 1M	256K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes

Intelligence

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Low): Best: 22.5
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026): 22.4

Coding

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Low): 73.5
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026): —

Agentic

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Low): 32.6
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Low): $0.75
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026): —

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Low): $3.75
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026): —

Context window

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Low): Best: 1M
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026): 256K

Reasoning

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Low): Yes
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026): Yes

Open weights

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Low): No
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026): Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Low)22.5 · $1.50

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026).