Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)
Google
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) Google	Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Anthropic
Intelligence	40.9	Best: 41.8
Coding	Best: 76.3	74.3
Agentic	40.2	Best: 41.9
Cyber Index	25.1%	—
Speed	158 t/s	—
TTFT	24 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.75	—
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$3.75	—
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	Yes	—
Cost / task	$1.24	—

Intelligence

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 40.9
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): Best: 41.8

Coding

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): Best: 76.3
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 74.3

Agentic

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 40.2
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): Best: 41.9

Cyber Index

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 25.1%
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —

Speed

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 158 t/s
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —

TTFT

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 24 s
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): $0.75
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): $3.75
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —

Context window

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 1M
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 1M

Reasoning

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): Yes
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): Yes

Open weights

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): Yes
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —

Cost / task

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): $1.24
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)40.9 · $1.24

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch).