Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium)
Google
Qwen3.8 Max
Alibaba

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium) Google	Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba
Intelligence	39.6	Best: 40.2
Coding	71.5	Best: 71.8
Agentic	—	49.1
Speed	Best: 392 t/s	38.2 t/s
TTFT	3.41 s	Best: 2.78 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.75	$2×2.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $3.75	$6×1.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	No
Cost / task	—	$2.67

Intelligence

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium): 39.6
Qwen3.8 Max: Best: 40.2

Coding

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium): 71.5
Qwen3.8 Max: Best: 71.8

Agentic

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium): —
Qwen3.8 Max: 49.1

Speed

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium): Best: 392 t/s
Qwen3.8 Max: 38.2 t/s

TTFT

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium): 3.41 s
Qwen3.8 Max: Best: 2.78 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium): Best: $0.75
Qwen3.8 Max: $2×2.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium): Best: $3.75
Qwen3.8 Max: $6×1.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium): 1M
Qwen3.8 Max: 1M

Reasoning

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium): Yes
Qwen3.8 Max: Yes

Open weights

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium): No
Qwen3.8 Max: No

Cost / task

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium): —
Qwen3.8 Max: $2.67

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Medium)39.6 · $1.50
Qwen3.8 Max40.2 · $3