Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal)
Google
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal) Google	Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) Anthropic
Intelligence	Best: 23.8	23.7
Math	—	62.7
Speed	Best: 176 t/s	46.1 t/s
TTFT	Best: 0.79 s	1.18 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $1.50	$5×3.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $9	$25×2.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	Best: 1M	200K
Reasoning	No	No
Open weights	No	No

Intelligence

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal): Best: 23.8
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): 23.7

Math

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal): —
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): 62.7

Speed

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal): Best: 176 t/s
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): 46.1 t/s

TTFT

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal): Best: 0.79 s
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): 1.18 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal): Best: $1.50
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): $5×3.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal): Best: $9
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): $25×2.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal): Best: 1M
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): 200K

Reasoning

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal): No
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): No

Open weights

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal): No
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): No

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal)23.8 · $3.38
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)23.7 · $10