Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium)
Google
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Alibaba

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium) Google	Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Alibaba
Intelligence	33.6	Best: 33.7
Coding	—	76.2
Agentic	—	56
Speed	Best: 171 t/s	36.7 t/s
TTFT	12.3 s	Best: 3.13 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $1.50	$2×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$9×1.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $6
Context window	Best: 1M	984K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	No
Cost / task	—	$10.02

Intelligence

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): 33.6
Qwen3.8 Max (0902): Best: 33.7

Coding

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): —
Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 76.2

Agentic

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): —
Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 56

Speed

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): Best: 171 t/s
Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 36.7 t/s

TTFT

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): 12.3 s
Qwen3.8 Max (0902): Best: 3.13 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): Best: $1.50
Qwen3.8 Max (0902): $2×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): $9×1.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Qwen3.8 Max (0902): Best: $6

Context window

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): Best: 1M
Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 984K

Reasoning

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): Yes
Qwen3.8 Max (0902): Yes

Open weights

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): No
Qwen3.8 Max (0902): No

Cost / task

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): —
Qwen3.8 Max (0902): $10.02

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium)33.6 · $3.38
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)33.7 · $3