Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium)
Google
GLM-5.2 (Max)
Z.AI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium) Google	GLM-5.2 (Max) Z.AI
Intelligence	33.6	Best: 33.7
Coding	—	68.8
Agentic	—	38.4
Speed	Best: 179 t/s	81.1 t/s
TTFT	12 s	Best: 3.21 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$1.50×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $1.40
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$9×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $4.40
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes
Cost / task	—	$1.47

Intelligence

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): 33.6
GLM-5.2 (Max): Best: 33.7

Coding

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): —
GLM-5.2 (Max): 68.8

Agentic

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): —
GLM-5.2 (Max): 38.4

Speed

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): Best: 179 t/s
GLM-5.2 (Max): 81.1 t/s

TTFT

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): 12 s
GLM-5.2 (Max): Best: 3.21 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): $1.50×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
GLM-5.2 (Max): Best: $1.40

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): $9×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
GLM-5.2 (Max): Best: $4.40

Context window

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): 1M
GLM-5.2 (Max): 1M

Reasoning

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): Yes
GLM-5.2 (Max): Yes

Open weights

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): No
GLM-5.2 (Max): Yes

Cost / task

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium): —
GLM-5.2 (Max): $1.47

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium)33.6 · $3.38
GLM-5.2 (Max)33.7 · $2.15