Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Xiaomi
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) Xiaomi | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 22.2 | Best: 22.4 | |
| Coding | 49.3 | — | |
| Agentic | 14.3 | — | |
| Speed | 454 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 8.09 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.30 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $2.50 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 1M | 256K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | Yes | |
| Cost / task | $0.193 | — |
Intelligence
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 22.2
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Best: 22.4
Coding
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 49.3
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
Agentic
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 14.3
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
Speed
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 454 t/s
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
TTFT
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 8.09 s
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- $0.30
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- $2.50
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
Context window
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- Best: 1M
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- 256K
Reasoning
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- Yes
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Yes
Open weights
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- No
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Yes
Cost / task
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- $0.193
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite22.2 · $0.193
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026).