Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)
Google
Motif 3
Motif Technologies

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) Google	Motif 3 Motif Technologies
Intelligence	32.6	Best: 33.6
Coding	Best: 70.1	63.5
Agentic	26	Best: 28.4
Speed	177 t/s	—
TTFT	14.7 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$1.50	—
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$9	—
Context window	Best: 1M	262K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes
Cost / task	$3.69	—

Intelligence

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 32.6
Motif 3: Best: 33.6

Coding

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): Best: 70.1
Motif 3: 63.5

Agentic

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 26
Motif 3: Best: 28.4

Speed

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 177 t/s
Motif 3: —

TTFT

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 14.7 s
Motif 3: —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): $1.50
Motif 3: —

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): $9
Motif 3: —

Context window

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): Best: 1M
Motif 3: 262K

Reasoning

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): Yes
Motif 3: Yes

Open weights

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): No
Motif 3: Yes

Cost / task

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): $3.69
Motif 3: —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)32.6 · $3.69

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Motif 3.