Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Google
Celeris-1
Celeris

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Google	Celeris-1 Celeris
Intelligence	6.2	Best: 6.3
Coding	Best: 34.7	14.4
Agentic	Best: 1.6	0.7
Speed	332 t/s	Best: 1,484 t/s
TTFT	4.58 s	Best: 0.57 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.25×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.20
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$1.50×2.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.70
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	No
Open weights	No	No
Cost / task	$0.195×3.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.0502

Intelligence

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 6.2
Celeris-1: Best: 6.3

Coding

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Best: 34.7
Celeris-1: 14.4

Agentic

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Best: 1.6
Celeris-1: 0.7

Speed

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 332 t/s
Celeris-1: Best: 1,484 t/s

TTFT

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 4.58 s
Celeris-1: Best: 0.57 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: $0.25×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Celeris-1: Best: $0.20

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: $1.50×2.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Celeris-1: Best: $0.70

Context window

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 1M
Celeris-1: 1M

Reasoning

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Yes
Celeris-1: No

Open weights

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: No
Celeris-1: No

Cost / task

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: $0.195×3.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Celeris-1: Best: $0.0502

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite6.2 · $0.195
Celeris-16.3 · $0.0502