Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
Google
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 14.5 | Best: 14.7 | |
| Coding | — | 43.4 | |
| Agentic | — | 4.2 | |
| Speed | — | 35.5 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 1.08 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $1.25 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $10 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 1M | 256K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | Yes | |
| Cost / task | — | $0 |
Intelligence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
- 14.5
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- Best: 14.7
Coding
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
- —
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- 43.4
Agentic
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
- —
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- 4.2
Speed
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
- —
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- 35.5 t/s
TTFT
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
- —
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- 1.08 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
- $1.25
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
- $10
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- —
Context window
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
- Best: 1M
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- 256K
Reasoning
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
- Yes
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- Yes
Open weights
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
- No
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- Yes
Cost / task
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
- —
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- $0
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)14.7 · $0
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25).