Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B DeepSeek | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 8.5 | 8.4 | |
| Math | 53.3 | Best: 63 | |
| Speed | 355 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 17.5 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.10 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.40 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 1M | 128K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
Intelligence
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)
- Best: 8.5
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
- 8.4
Math
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)
- 53.3
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
- Best: 63
Speed
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)
- 355 t/s
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
- —
TTFT
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)
- 17.5 s
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)
- $0.10
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)
- $0.40
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
- —
Context window
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)
- Best: 1M
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
- 128K
Reasoning
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)
- Yes
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
- Yes
Open weights
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)
- No
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)8.5 · $0.175
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.