Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25)
Google
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Qwen

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25) Google	Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking Qwen
Intelligence	9.4	Best: 9.5
Coding	24.1	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	—	$0.29
Output · $ / 1M tokens	—	$1
Context window	Best: 1M	262K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes

Intelligence

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25): 9.4
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: Best: 9.5

Coding

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25): 24.1
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25): —
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: $0.29

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25): —
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: $1

Context window

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25): Best: 1M
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: 262K

Reasoning

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25): Yes
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: Yes

Open weights

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25): No
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking9.5 · $0.467

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25).