Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25)
Google
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
Google

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25) Google	Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) Google
Intelligence	8.9	8.9
Coding	—	9.4
Math	21.7	—
Speed	—	44.4 t/s
TTFT	—	0.96 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	—	$0.020
Output · $ / 1M tokens	—	$0.10
Context window	Best: 1M	128K
Reasoning	No	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes
Cost / task	—	$0.0082

Intelligence

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25): 8.9
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 8.9

Coding

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25): —
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 9.4

Math

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25): 21.7
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): —

Speed

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25): —
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 44.4 t/s

TTFT

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25): —
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 0.96 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25): —
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): $0.020

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25): —
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): $0.10

Context window

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25): Best: 1M
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 128K

Reasoning

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25): No
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): Yes

Open weights

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25): No
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): Yes

Cost / task

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25): —
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): $0.0082

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)8.9 · $0.0082

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25).