Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
Google
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Alibaba
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24) | Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Alibaba | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 7.9 | 7.9 | |
| Coding | 23.6 | — | |
| Math | — | 72.3 | |
| Speed | — | 24 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 3.05 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.35 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.60 | |
| Context window | Best: 2M | 256K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
Intelligence
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
- 7.9
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- 7.9
Coding
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
- 23.6
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- —
Math
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
- —
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- 72.3
Speed
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
- —
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- 24 t/s
TTFT
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
- —
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- 3.05 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
- —
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- $0.35
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
- —
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- $0.60
Context window
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
- Best: 2M
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- 256K
Reasoning
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
- No
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- No
Open weights
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
- No
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct7.9 · $0.412
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24).