Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
Google
- Phi-4 Mini Instruct
Microsoft
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B | Phi-4 Mini Instruct Microsoft | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 6.2 | Best: 6.3 | |
| Coding | — | 3.8 | |
| Math | — | 6.7 | |
| Speed | — | 46.2 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 0.82 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.075 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.30 | |
| Context window | Best: 1M | 128K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
Intelligence
- Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
- 6.2
- Phi-4 Mini Instruct
- Best: 6.3
Coding
- Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
- —
- Phi-4 Mini Instruct
- 3.8
Math
- Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
- —
- Phi-4 Mini Instruct
- 6.7
Speed
- Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
- —
- Phi-4 Mini Instruct
- 46.2 t/s
TTFT
- Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
- —
- Phi-4 Mini Instruct
- 0.82 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
- —
- Phi-4 Mini Instruct
- $0.075
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
- —
- Phi-4 Mini Instruct
- $0.30
Context window
- Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
- Best: 1M
- Phi-4 Mini Instruct
- 128K
Reasoning
- Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
- No
- Phi-4 Mini Instruct
- No
Open weights
- Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
- No
- Phi-4 Mini Instruct
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Phi-4 Mini Instruct6.3 · $0.131
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B.