Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
LG AI Research
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning) LG AI Research | Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) Alibaba | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 13.2 | Best: 13.3 | |
| Coding | 23.6 | Best: 28.7 | |
| Agentic | — | 1.2 | |
| Speed | — | 64.2 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 1.59 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.135 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.20 | |
| Context window | 262K | Best: 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | — | $0.213 |
Intelligence
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
- 13.2
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
- Best: 13.3
Coding
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
- 23.6
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
- Best: 28.7
Agentic
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
- —
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
- 1.2
Speed
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
- —
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
- 64.2 t/s
TTFT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
- —
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
- 1.59 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
- —
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
- $0.135
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
- —
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
- $0.20
Context window
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
- 262K
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
- Best: 1M
Reasoning
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
- Yes
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
- Yes
Open weights
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
- Yes
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
- Yes
Cost / task
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
- —
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
- $0.213
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)13.3 · $0.213
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning).