Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)
LG AI Research
Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning)
Amazon

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) LG AI Research	Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning) Amazon
Intelligence	8.2	8.2
Math	Best: 80	37
Input · $ / 1M tokens	—	$0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens	—	$2.50
Context window	131K	Best: 1M
Reasoning	Yes	No
Open weights	Yes	No

Intelligence

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning): 8.2
Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning): 8.2

Math

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning): Best: 80
Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning): 37

Input · $ / 1M tokens

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning): —
Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning): $0.30

Output · $ / 1M tokens

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning): —
Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning): $2.50

Context window

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning): 131K
Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning): Best: 1M

Reasoning

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning): Yes
Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning): No

Open weights

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning): Yes
Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning): No

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning)8.2 · $0.85

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning).