Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)
LG AI Research
- Jamba 1.5 Mini
AI21 Labs
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning) LG AI Research | Jamba 1.5 Mini AI21 Labs | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 5.2 | 5.2 | |
| Math | 24 | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.20 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.40 | |
| Context window | 64K | Best: 256K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)
- 5.2
- Jamba 1.5 Mini
- 5.2
Math
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)
- 24
- Jamba 1.5 Mini
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)
- —
- Jamba 1.5 Mini
- $0.20
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)
- —
- Jamba 1.5 Mini
- $0.40
Context window
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)
- 64K
- Jamba 1.5 Mini
- Best: 256K
Reasoning
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)
- No
- Jamba 1.5 Mini
- No
Open weights
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)
- Yes
- Jamba 1.5 Mini
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Jamba 1.5 Mini5.2 · $0.25
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning).