Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 8.1 | Best: 8.2 | |
| Math | Best: 63.7 | 37 | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.30 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $2.50 | |
| Context window | 32.8K | Best: 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
Intelligence
- DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
- 8.1
- Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 8.2
Math
- DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
- Best: 63.7
- Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning)
- 37
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
- —
- Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning)
- $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
- —
- Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning)
- $2.50
Context window
- DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
- 32.8K
- Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 1M
Reasoning
- DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
- Yes
- Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning)
- No
Open weights
- DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
- Yes
- Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning)8.2 · $0.85
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B.