Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Claude Sonnet 5 (High)
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 (batch)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Claude Sonnet 5 (High) Anthropic	Claude Opus 4.6 (batch) Anthropic
Intelligence	31.7	Best: 31.9
Speed	59 t/s	—
TTFT	14.3 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$2	—
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$10	—
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	—
Cost / task	$1.79	—

Intelligence

Claude Sonnet 5 (High): 31.7
Claude Opus 4.6 (batch): Best: 31.9

Speed

Claude Sonnet 5 (High): 59 t/s
Claude Opus 4.6 (batch): —

TTFT

Claude Sonnet 5 (High): 14.3 s
Claude Opus 4.6 (batch): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Sonnet 5 (High): $2
Claude Opus 4.6 (batch): —

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Sonnet 5 (High): $10
Claude Opus 4.6 (batch): —

Context window

Claude Sonnet 5 (High): 1M
Claude Opus 4.6 (batch): 1M

Reasoning

Claude Sonnet 5 (High): Yes
Claude Opus 4.6 (batch): Yes

Open weights

Claude Sonnet 5 (High): No
Claude Opus 4.6 (batch): —

Cost / task

Claude Sonnet 5 (High): $1.79
Claude Opus 4.6 (batch): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Claude Sonnet 5 (High)31.7 · $1.79

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Claude Opus 4.6 (batch).