Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)
Anthropic
GPT-5 (High)
OpenAI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) Anthropic	GPT-5 (High) OpenAI
Intelligence	Best: 23.3	23
Coding	—	37.8
Math	—	94.3
Speed	44.1 t/s	Best: 102 t/s
TTFT	Best: 1.15 s	71.8 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$3×2.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $1.25
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$15×1.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $10
Context window	Best: 1M	400K
Reasoning	No	Yes
Open weights	No	No

Intelligence

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): Best: 23.3
GPT-5 (High): 23

Coding

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): —
GPT-5 (High): 37.8

Math

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): —
GPT-5 (High): 94.3

Speed

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): 44.1 t/s
GPT-5 (High): Best: 102 t/s

TTFT

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): Best: 1.15 s
GPT-5 (High): 71.8 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): $3×2.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
GPT-5 (High): Best: $1.25

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): $15×1.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
GPT-5 (High): Best: $10

Context window

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): Best: 1M
GPT-5 (High): 400K

Reasoning

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): No
GPT-5 (High): Yes

Open weights

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): No
GPT-5 (High): No

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)23.3 · $6
GPT-5 (High)23 · $3.44