Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Claude Opus 5 (Max)
Anthropic
Muse Wonder (Max)
Meta

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Claude Opus 5 (Max) Anthropic	Muse Wonder (Max) Meta
Intelligence	50.8	Best: 52.4
Coding	78	—
Agentic	56.5	—
Speed	58.3 t/s	Best: 149 t/s
TTFT	Best: 22.1 s	26.5 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$5×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $4
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$25×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $20
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	No
Cost / task	$5.86×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $4.54

Intelligence

Claude Opus 5 (Max): 50.8
Muse Wonder (Max): Best: 52.4

Coding

Claude Opus 5 (Max): 78
Muse Wonder (Max): —

Agentic

Claude Opus 5 (Max): 56.5
Muse Wonder (Max): —

Speed

Claude Opus 5 (Max): 58.3 t/s
Muse Wonder (Max): Best: 149 t/s

TTFT

Claude Opus 5 (Max): Best: 22.1 s
Muse Wonder (Max): 26.5 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Opus 5 (Max): $5×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Muse Wonder (Max): Best: $4

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Opus 5 (Max): $25×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Muse Wonder (Max): Best: $20

Context window

Claude Opus 5 (Max): 1M
Muse Wonder (Max): 1M

Reasoning

Claude Opus 5 (Max): Yes
Muse Wonder (Max): Yes

Open weights

Claude Opus 5 (Max): No
Muse Wonder (Max): No

Cost / task

Claude Opus 5 (Max): $5.86×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Muse Wonder (Max): Best: $4.54

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Claude Opus 5 (Max)50.8 · $5.86
Muse Wonder (Max)52.4 · $4.54