Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
Anthropic
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Anthropic	Ling 3.1 Flash InclusionAI
Intelligence	Best: 41.8	41.1
Coding	74.3	—
Agentic	41.9	—
Speed	—	216 t/s
TTFT	—	1.73 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$2.50×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$12.50×13.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.90
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	—	Yes
Cost / task	—	$1.01

Intelligence

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): Best: 41.8
Ling 3.1 Flash: 41.1

Coding

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 74.3
Ling 3.1 Flash: —

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 41.9
Ling 3.1 Flash: —

Speed

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —
Ling 3.1 Flash: 216 t/s

TTFT

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —
Ling 3.1 Flash: 1.73 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): $2.50×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: $0.30

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): $12.50×13.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: $0.90

Context window

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 1M
Ling 3.1 Flash: 1M

Reasoning

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): Yes
Ling 3.1 Flash: Yes

Open weights

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —
Ling 3.1 Flash: Yes

Cost / task

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —
Ling 3.1 Flash: $1.01

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)41.8 · $5
Ling 3.1 Flash41.1 · $0.45