Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)
Anthropic
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) Anthropic | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 29.1 | Best: 29.6 | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $2.50×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.30 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $12.50×13.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.90 | |
| Context window | 200K | Best: 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | — | Yes | |
| Cost / task | — | $3.19 |
Intelligence
- Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)
- 29.1
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
- Best: 29.6
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)
- $2.50×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
- Best: $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)
- $12.50×13.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
- Best: $0.90
Context window
- Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)
- 200K
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
- Best: 1M
Reasoning
- Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)
- Yes
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
- Yes
Open weights
- Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)
- —
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
- Yes
Cost / task
- Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)
- —
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
- $3.19
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)29.1 · $5
- Ling 3.1 Flash 101929.6 · $0.45