Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) Anthropic	Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) Anthropic
Intelligence	29.1	29.1
Math	—	62.7
Speed	—	46.8 t/s
TTFT	—	1.11 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $2.50	$5×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $12.50	$25×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	200K	Best: 1M
Reasoning	Yes	No
Open weights	—	No

Intelligence

Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): 29.1
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): 29.1

Math

Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): —
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): 62.7

Speed

Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): —
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): 46.8 t/s

TTFT

Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): —
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): 1.11 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): Best: $2.50
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): $5×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): Best: $12.50
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): $25×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): 200K
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): Best: 1M

Reasoning

Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): Yes
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): No

Open weights

Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): —
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): No

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)29.1 · $5
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)29.1 · $10