Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)
Anthropic
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) Anthropic	Ling 3.1 Flash InclusionAI
Intelligence	40.7	Best: 41.1
Coding	73.6	—
Agentic	38.6	—
Speed	61.4 t/s	Best: 215 t/s
TTFT	20.1 s	Best: 1.78 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$5×16.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$25×27.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.90
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes
Cost / task	—	$1.0

Intelligence

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 40.7
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: 41.1

Coding

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 73.6
Ling 3.1 Flash: —

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 38.6
Ling 3.1 Flash: —

Speed

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 61.4 t/s
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: 215 t/s

TTFT

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 20.1 s
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: 1.78 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): $5×16.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: $0.30

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): $25×27.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: $0.90

Context window

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 1M
Ling 3.1 Flash: 1M

Reasoning

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): Yes
Ling 3.1 Flash: Yes

Open weights

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): No
Ling 3.1 Flash: Yes

Cost / task

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): —
Ling 3.1 Flash: $1.0

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)40.7 · $10
Ling 3.1 Flash41.1 · $0.45