Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Motif 3 (Beta)
Motif Technologies
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Motif 3 (Beta) Motif Technologies | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 31.9 | Best: 32.3 | |
| Coding | — | 62 | |
| Speed | 38.2 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 1.82 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $5 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $25 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 1M | 262K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | No |
Intelligence
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- 31.9
- Motif 3 (Beta)
- Best: 32.3
Coding
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- —
- Motif 3 (Beta)
- 62
Speed
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- 38.2 t/s
- Motif 3 (Beta)
- —
TTFT
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- 1.82 s
- Motif 3 (Beta)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- $5
- Motif 3 (Beta)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- $25
- Motif 3 (Beta)
- —
Context window
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- Best: 1M
- Motif 3 (Beta)
- 262K
Reasoning
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- No
- Motif 3 (Beta)
- Yes
Open weights
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- No
- Motif 3 (Beta)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)31.9 · $10
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Motif 3 (Beta).