Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- GLM-5-Turbo
Z.AI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | GLM-5-Turbo Z.AI | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 26.4 | Best: 26.6 | |
| Speed | 37.8 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 2.13 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $5 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $25 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 1M | 200K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | No |
Intelligence
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- 26.4
- GLM-5-Turbo
- Best: 26.6
Speed
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- 37.8 t/s
- GLM-5-Turbo
- —
TTFT
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- 2.13 s
- GLM-5-Turbo
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- $5
- GLM-5-Turbo
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- $25
- GLM-5-Turbo
- —
Context window
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- Best: 1M
- GLM-5-Turbo
- 200K
Reasoning
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- No
- GLM-5-Turbo
- Yes
Open weights
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- No
- GLM-5-Turbo
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)26.4 · $10
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: GLM-5-Turbo.