Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 26.4 | 26.3 | |
| Speed | 37.8 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 2.13 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $5 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $25 | — | |
| Context window | 1M | Best: 1.05M | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | — |
Intelligence
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- Best: 26.4
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview (batch)
- 26.3
Speed
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- 37.8 t/s
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview (batch)
- —
TTFT
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- 2.13 s
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview (batch)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- $5
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview (batch)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- $25
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview (batch)
- —
Context window
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- 1M
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview (batch)
- Best: 1.05M
Reasoning
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- No
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview (batch)
- Yes
Open weights
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- No
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview (batch)
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)26.4 · $10
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Gemini 3 Flash Preview (batch).