Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)
Anthropic
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) Anthropic	Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba
Intelligence	29.1	Best: 29.5
Coding	—	66
Math	91.3	—
Agentic	—	22.5
Speed	48.5 t/s	Best: 191 t/s
TTFT	18.1 s	Best: 2.29 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$5×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $2.50
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$25×3.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $7.50
Context window	200K	Best: 1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	No
Cost / task	—	$1.15

Intelligence

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): 29.1
Qwen3.7 Max: Best: 29.5

Coding

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): —
Qwen3.7 Max: 66

Math

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): 91.3
Qwen3.7 Max: —

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): —
Qwen3.7 Max: 22.5

Speed

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): 48.5 t/s
Qwen3.7 Max: Best: 191 t/s

TTFT

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): 18.1 s
Qwen3.7 Max: Best: 2.29 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): $5×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Qwen3.7 Max: Best: $2.50

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): $25×3.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Qwen3.7 Max: Best: $7.50

Context window

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): 200K
Qwen3.7 Max: Best: 1M

Reasoning

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): Yes
Qwen3.7 Max: Yes

Open weights

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): No
Qwen3.7 Max: No

Cost / task

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): —
Qwen3.7 Max: $1.15

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)29.1 · $10
Qwen3.7 Max29.5 · $3.75