Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) Anthropic	Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) Anthropic
Intelligence	29.1	29.1
Math	91.3	—
Speed	48.5 t/s	—
TTFT	16.6 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$5	—
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$25	—
Context window	200K	200K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	—

Intelligence

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): 29.1
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): 29.1

Math

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): —

Speed

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): 48.5 t/s
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): —

TTFT

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): 16.6 s
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): $5
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): —

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): $25
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): —

Context window

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): 200K
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): 200K

Reasoning

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): Yes
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): Yes

Open weights

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): No
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)29.1 · $10

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Claude Opus 4.5 (batch).