Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
- MiMo-V2-Omni
Xiaomi
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) Anthropic | MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 23.7 | Best: 23.9 | |
| Math | 62.7 | — | |
| Speed | 46.1 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 1.18 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $5 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $25 | — | |
| Context window | 200K | Best: 256K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | No |
Intelligence
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
- 23.7
- MiMo-V2-Omni
- Best: 23.9
Math
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
- 62.7
- MiMo-V2-Omni
- —
Speed
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
- 46.1 t/s
- MiMo-V2-Omni
- —
TTFT
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
- 1.18 s
- MiMo-V2-Omni
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
- $5
- MiMo-V2-Omni
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
- $25
- MiMo-V2-Omni
- —
Context window
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
- 200K
- MiMo-V2-Omni
- Best: 256K
Reasoning
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
- No
- MiMo-V2-Omni
- Yes
Open weights
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
- No
- MiMo-V2-Omni
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)23.7 · $10
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: MiMo-V2-Omni.