Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
Anthropic
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) Anthropic	Ling 3.1 Flash InclusionAI
Intelligence	Best: 41.2	41.1
Speed	181 t/s	Best: 211 t/s
TTFT	78.6 s	Best: 1.91 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.10	$0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.50	$0.90×1.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	No
Cost / task	Best: $0.124	$1.0×8.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Intelligence

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): Best: 41.2
Ling 3.1 Flash: 41.1

Speed

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 181 t/s
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: 211 t/s

TTFT

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 78.6 s
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: 1.91 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): Best: $0.10
Ling 3.1 Flash: $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): Best: $0.50
Ling 3.1 Flash: $0.90×1.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 1M
Ling 3.1 Flash: 1M

Reasoning

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): Yes
Ling 3.1 Flash: Yes

Open weights

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): No
Ling 3.1 Flash: No

Cost / task

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): Best: $0.124
Ling 3.1 Flash: $1.0×8.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)41.2 · $0.124
Ling 3.1 Flash41.1 · $1.0