Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)
Anthropic
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
InclusionAI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) Anthropic	Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 InclusionAI
Intelligence	Best: 29.9	29.6
Speed	164 t/s	—
TTFT	30.4 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.10	$0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.50	$0.90×1.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes
Cost / task	Best: $0.159	$3.19×20.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Intelligence

Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): Best: 29.9
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: 29.6

Speed

Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 164 t/s
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: —

TTFT

Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 30.4 s
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): Best: $0.10
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): Best: $0.50
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: $0.90×1.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 1M
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: 1M

Reasoning

Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): Yes
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: Yes

Open weights

Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): No
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: Yes

Cost / task

Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): Best: $0.159
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: $3.19×20.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)29.9 · $0.159
Ling 3.1 Flash 101929.6 · $3.19