Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
Ring-2.6-1T
InclusionAI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic	Ring-2.6-1T InclusionAI
Intelligence	16.6	16.6
Coding	—	42.8
Math	36.3	—
Agentic	—	10.7
Speed	—	114 t/s
TTFT	—	3.87 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$75×30 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $2.50
Context window	200K	Best: 262K
Reasoning	No	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes
Cost / task	—	$0.287

Intelligence

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): 16.6
Ring-2.6-1T: 16.6

Coding

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): —
Ring-2.6-1T: 42.8

Math

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): 36.3
Ring-2.6-1T: —

Agentic

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): —
Ring-2.6-1T: 10.7

Speed

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): —
Ring-2.6-1T: 114 t/s

TTFT

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): —
Ring-2.6-1T: 3.87 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): $15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ring-2.6-1T: Best: $0.30

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): $75×30 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ring-2.6-1T: Best: $2.50

Context window

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): 200K
Ring-2.6-1T: Best: 262K

Reasoning

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): No
Ring-2.6-1T: Yes

Open weights

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): No
Ring-2.6-1T: Yes

Cost / task

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): —
Ring-2.6-1T: $0.287

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)16.6 · $30
Ring-2.6-1T16.6 · $0.85