Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
MiniMax-M2.5
MiniMax

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic	MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax
Intelligence	22.8	22.8
Speed	—	44.4 t/s
TTFT	—	1.73 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$75×62.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $1.20
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	No	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes

Intelligence

Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): 22.8
MiniMax-M2.5: 22.8

Speed

Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —
MiniMax-M2.5: 44.4 t/s

TTFT

Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —
MiniMax-M2.5: 1.73 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): $15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
MiniMax-M2.5: Best: $0.30

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): $75×62.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
MiniMax-M2.5: Best: $1.20

Context window

Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): 1M
MiniMax-M2.5: 1M

Reasoning

Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): No
MiniMax-M2.5: Yes

Open weights

Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): No
MiniMax-M2.5: Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)22.8 · $30
MiniMax-M2.522.8 · $0.525