Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
- MiniMax-M2
MiniMax
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic | MiniMax-M2 MiniMax | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 18.6 | 18.6 | |
| Math | — | 78.3 | |
| Speed | — | 65.5 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 1.46 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.30 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $75×62.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $1.20 | |
| Context window | 200K | Best: 205K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
Intelligence
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 18.6
- MiniMax-M2
- 18.6
Math
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
- MiniMax-M2
- 78.3
Speed
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
- MiniMax-M2
- 65.5 t/s
TTFT
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
- MiniMax-M2
- 1.46 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- MiniMax-M2
- Best: $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $75×62.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- MiniMax-M2
- Best: $1.20
Context window
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 200K
- MiniMax-M2
- Best: 205K
Reasoning
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
- MiniMax-M2
- Yes
Open weights
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
- MiniMax-M2
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)18.6 · $30
- MiniMax-M218.6 · $0.525