Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 22.8 | 22.7 | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $15×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $5 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $75×2.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $30 | |
| Context window | 1M | 1M | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | No |
Intelligence
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 22.8
- GPT-5.5 Instant (May 2026)
- 22.7
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $15×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- GPT-5.5 Instant (May 2026)
- Best: $5
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $75×2.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- GPT-5.5 Instant (May 2026)
- Best: $30
Context window
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 1M
- GPT-5.5 Instant (May 2026)
- 1M
Reasoning
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
- GPT-5.5 Instant (May 2026)
- Yes
Open weights
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
- GPT-5.5 Instant (May 2026)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)22.8 · $30
- GPT-5.5 Instant (May 2026)22.7 · $11.25