Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Claude 3 Opus Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 8.7 | 8.7 | |
| Coding | 19.5 | — | |
| Math | — | 33.7 | |
| Speed | — | 167 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 1.18 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $15×45.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.33 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $75×27.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $2.75 | |
| Context window | 200K | Best: 1M | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | No | No |
Intelligence
- Claude 3 Opus
- 8.7
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- 8.7
Coding
- Claude 3 Opus
- 19.5
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- —
Math
- Claude 3 Opus
- —
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- 33.7
Speed
- Claude 3 Opus
- —
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- 167 t/s
TTFT
- Claude 3 Opus
- —
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- 1.18 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude 3 Opus
- $15×45.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- Best: $0.33
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude 3 Opus
- $75×27.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- Best: $2.75
Context window
- Claude 3 Opus
- 200K
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 1M
Reasoning
- Claude 3 Opus
- No
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- No
Open weights
- Claude 3 Opus
- No
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Claude 3 Opus8.7 · $30
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)8.7 · $0.935