Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Claude 3 Opus Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 8.7 | 8.7 | |
| Coding | 19.5 | Best: 25.5 | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $15 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $75 | — | |
| Context window | 200K | Best: 2M | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | No | No |
Intelligence
- Claude 3 Opus
- 8.7
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- 8.7
Coding
- Claude 3 Opus
- 19.5
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- Best: 25.5
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude 3 Opus
- $15
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude 3 Opus
- $75
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- —
Context window
- Claude 3 Opus
- 200K
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- Best: 2M
Reasoning
- Claude 3 Opus
- No
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- No
Open weights
- Claude 3 Opus
- No
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Claude 3 Opus8.7 · $30
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25).