Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Claude 2.0
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Claude 2.0 Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 5.5 | 5.5 | |
| Coding | 12.9 | Best: 29.9 | |
| Agentic | — | 3.5 | |
| Speed | — | 41.4 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 0.97 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.16 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.65 | |
| Context window | 100K | Best: 131K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | Yes | |
| Cost / task | — | $0.0717 |
Intelligence
- Claude 2.0
- 5.5
- Granite 4.2 30B
- 5.5
Coding
- Claude 2.0
- 12.9
- Granite 4.2 30B
- Best: 29.9
Agentic
- Claude 2.0
- —
- Granite 4.2 30B
- 3.5
Speed
- Claude 2.0
- —
- Granite 4.2 30B
- 41.4 t/s
TTFT
- Claude 2.0
- —
- Granite 4.2 30B
- 0.97 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude 2.0
- —
- Granite 4.2 30B
- $0.16
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Claude 2.0
- —
- Granite 4.2 30B
- $0.65
Context window
- Claude 2.0
- 100K
- Granite 4.2 30B
- Best: 131K
Reasoning
- Claude 2.0
- No
- Granite 4.2 30B
- Yes
Open weights
- Claude 2.0
- No
- Granite 4.2 30B
- Yes
Cost / task
- Claude 2.0
- —
- Granite 4.2 30B
- $0.0717
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Granite 4.2 30B5.5 · $0.0717
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Claude 2.0.