Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Arctic Instruct
Snowflake
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Arctic Instruct Snowflake | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 5.4 | 5.4 | |
| Math | — | 1.7 | |
| Speed | — | 22.7 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 1.62 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.345 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.345 | |
| Context window | 4K | Best: 128K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Arctic Instruct
- 5.4
- Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
- 5.4
Math
- Arctic Instruct
- —
- Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
- 1.7
Speed
- Arctic Instruct
- —
- Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
- 22.7 t/s
TTFT
- Arctic Instruct
- —
- Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
- 1.62 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Arctic Instruct
- —
- Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
- $0.345
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Arctic Instruct
- —
- Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
- $0.345
Context window
- Arctic Instruct
- 4K
- Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
- Best: 128K
Reasoning
- Arctic Instruct
- No
- Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
- No
Open weights
- Arctic Instruct
- Yes
- Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)5.4 · $0.345
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Arctic Instruct.